I’ve spent a lot of time to take these pictures, organize them, and share them. I’ve spent a lot of money on camera gear to take these pictures. 0 Comments Written May 4 th, 2014 in, I snap.
Os X Adobe Lightroom With Synology Nas Mac Desktop RunningHe has LR Classic installed and running fine on the Mac, but when I set up the NAS yesterday, I mounted the drive via Finder and it is visible and usable from. He is a Mac man (I'm all Windows) and has just bought a shiny new Mac desktop running whatever the current O/S is. NAS is in the house for security reasons and the fact that it's FAR TOO LOUD to tolerate in my office.I'm helping my brother set up a new Synology NAS on his home network. I have Cat 6 GbE for internet and the like, plus a dedicated 20,000 Mb/s link (2 x 10Gb-SR in LACP over fibre optic) to a Synology RS3617xs with 12 x 4 TB HDDs in RAID10. Keep about 5 of the images and then copy the folder of finished images to the Synology NAS.-It's at this point that I'd like to have LR Classic 'look' for finished images on the Synology NAS as it's easier than having all of my images on a bunch of GDrives.I've just upgraded my network and storage setup - I have a Windows 10 desktop PC in my office (dedicated concrete 'man-shed' in the back garden).However, one of the Adobe engineers (Dan Tull) did some experimentation in hoodwinking Lightroom into using a network-based catalog, and he reported that he consistently managed to irretrievably corrupt the catalog (and at the time he was the acknowledged expert in repairing corrupted catalogs). Attempting to open a catalog on a volume which Lightroom detects as being a network volume will fail, and the error message will explain why.Of course there are ways around this restriction, and over the years some users have reported success. Are there other good technical reasons why it's not a good idea?What I know is that the Lightroom catalog uses SQlite, and that either LR or SQlite (or both) does not allow the catalog to be placed on a network volume. Which mac charger do i need for late 2011 macbook proCIFS and SMB (both for accessing NAS data) are different from each other but are treating almost identically. IDE is brain dead compared to SCSI in some ways. Network-based catalogs are not supported, period.Whilst you may have success in getting it to work, we would prefer that the actual technical details are not posted in an open forum post.not everyone has the same level of technical competence, so blindly trying to replicate what may be complex setup instructions could easily lead the less savvy user into catalog disaster, which we would rather not have happen.That's true of almost all storage, the underlying protocols are different. You get the idea.Also, "network" to many people means Wifi, subject to all sorts of issues of interference and capacity.Also, and I am sure with exceptions, external systems are just not as reliable in most cases. Ooops, that wasn't the card reader, it was my EHD. Unplug the card reader and. When you have a drive outside the computer - NAS for sure, EHD also - it is extremely easy for the operator (which any statistic you check will show is the least reliable component) to accidentally disconnect it. And "network storage" can run over numerous protocols, some with lots of error checking and redundancy, some with very little.To me there's one big difference, and it actually applies to the (permitted) use of EHD/USB drives - When you have an internal drive in your computer, absent hardware failure, the drive is up and available all the time the computer is available. Or a different UPS that might go down separately.Honestly, Lightroom's technical restrictions aside (to coin a phrase) - you are just plain better off keeping your images close, and your catalog closer (to your computer).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKimberly ArchivesCategories |